Skip to main content

More transparancy and respect for mores in NGO CSW community Please

This morning at the end of this mornings NGO CSW briefing I handed over a letter to the NGO Committee on the Status of Women on behalf of several ECOSOC accredited NGO's to the chair of the Committee, Ms. Soon-Young Yoon.
The procedural errors at the NA/European/NIS caucus last week prompted some Dutch NGOs to draft the letter. We think it is very important that participants in the CSW-NGO process are familiar with the written and unwritten procedures with respect to UN in general and the CSW process in particular. It was obvious last week that several are not (yet) and that some took the approach that the (their?) end justifies the means.

So we shared our concerns and formulated practical suggestions to overcome the gaps in knowledge:


  • A more extended/accurate description of the caucus process (and the distinction between a caucus and a group) at http://www.ngocsw.org/ngo-csw-forum and in the Handbook.
  • Explanation of the caucus process at the NGO CSW Forum Consultation Day and during the morning NGO CSW briefings.
  •  A (short) training module for facilitators of the regional caucuses, including unbiased facilitation but also clarity on procedures from the CSW organising side for the benefit of facilitators (who otherwise have no guidance available on how to sort out disagreement among participants).
  • A constructive conversation, possibly via email, with representative(s) that are familiar with the process about improvements in the procedure, for instance on the subject of ensuring the inclusion of minority opinions in the consensus process, and/or ensuring that non-accredited NGOs do not dominate caucus debates let alone caucus decision making.

We firmly believe that following proper procedures by NGOs with respect to each other ultimately will strengthen joint lobby and improve the understanding between governments and civil society in the CSW-process.
We firmly believe that following proper procedures by NGOs with respect to each other ultimately We will need both to make next years CSW and the commemoration of Beijing next year a success.
We invite all of you to participate in a constructive conversation via email.




ECOSOC Accredited NGOs that endorsed the letter: 



COC Netherlands

Cordaid (the Netherlands)

Dutch Women's Council

Hivos (Humanist Institute for Cooperation with Developing Countries, the Netherlands)

International Network of Liberal Women

RFSL, (The Swedish Federation for LGBT Rights)

Rutgers/WPF (the Netherlands)

The Netherlands Association of Women's Rights, Women's Work and Equal Citizenship

Tiye International (Platform of the National Organisations of black, migrant and refugee women) 

Unfortunately it is not (yet) possible to upload a PDF to the blogspot, the full letter in PDF however can be requested via womenny@gmail.com


Leontine Bijleveld


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The CSW68 is a wrap!

  Met Nederlands ambassadeur en CSW Facilitator Yoka Brandt op de foto na afloop van de CSW68 “We have reservations on the text. We don’t have instructions to proceed to adoption .” After seven days of negotiations at the UN during this year’s Commission on the Status of Women (CSW), Nigeria almost blocked the negotiated outcome document from being adopted. Almost, because after some formal and informal interventions in Conference Room 4, the Nigerian delegate, flanked by the Dutch Ambassador Yoka Brandt, added: “I now have instructions to support the adoption.” On the balcony filled with civil society as well as in the plenary room there was a clear sigh of relief followed by enthusiastic applause, hugging and photo taking. We have Agreed Conclusions ! Early negotiations As usual, the CSW negotiations process started early February with a Zero Draft , developed by UN Women and the CSW Bureau. And with input and inspiration taken from the Secretary General Report. For the EU, as

CSW68 Youth Dialogue statement by Fenna Timsi

  Dutch youth representative Fenna Timsi gives her statement in the CSW68 Youth Dialogue On Thursday afternoon, 14 March 2024, the Dutch youth representative Fenna Timsi gave her statement in the CSW68 Youth Dialogue inside the UN. The reflections from several participants of this year's Youth Dialogue - the second ever as part of the CSW - were that it has much improved compared to last year. Importantly, many more of the people who were given the floor were actually young people themselves. Many of the statements were rich and relevant in content with clear and important messages for the government delegates in the other room in the UN who had started the negotiations for the outcome document. Read Fenna's statement below or see the full Youth Dialogue here (Fenna's statement is at 1:20:10). Dear all,   As the Dutch UN Youth Representative, I thank you to speak independently on behalf of young people in the Netherlands, not on behalf of the government. I spoke to many yo

Blog #4 by Sanne: We need progress on Loss & Damage!

Today the CSW’s main outcome document, the Agreed Conclusions, continued. At this CSW66, it is not only essential that we move forward on gender equality issues, but also on climate, environmental and disaster-risk reduction action! We need to connect to existing discussions in different UN-spaces to ensure that our discussions here in New York strengthen our intersectional, transformative climate action and that gender equality is central. Because we want this CSW to ensure that we deal with environmental & climate crises as coherently and strongly as possible. We can’t wait any longer!