Skip to main content

On the eve of the second week - where do we stand?

Tomorrow the second week of CSW begins. During the weekend most of us have taken the - much needed - time to relax a bit, catch up informally, and gather strength for the week to come. A new version of the agreed conclusions is expected tomorrow morning at the latest, and will be negotiated the coming days. This new text will include the facilitator's proposals, taking into account all that has been written and said by government delegations during the reading last Thursday and Friday (which ended at 1 'o clock Friday night!). Everyone is awaiting the new text full of aspiration...

In a recent interview with AWID, activist Cynthia Rothschild - an active member of the international Women's Rights Caucus in which WO=MEN members also participate - highlights a similar sentiment that was echoed by those who were present at the EU briefing on Tuesday. What it comes down to, and I am using my own wording now, is that civil society calls on governments to go beyond "holding the line" on what has already been agreed to years ago, but to go forwards and be ambitious - by really placing women's human rights, women's empowerment and gender equality at the center of sustainable development. This of course taking into account that this year's CSW is about the challenges and achievements of the Millennium Development Goals from a gender perspective, and the lesson we learn from this for the Post-2015 development agenda. 

Considering the good news coming out from the conference room about the Thursday-Friday negotiations, we are positive that this CSW will end with an agreement, which will reflect progress. The atmosphere in the room is good, delegates are respectful towards each other and listen. And the group of likeminded countries, which advocate for progress on contentuous issues such as sexual and reproductive rights and recognition of the marginalization of people on the basis of their sexual orientation and/or gender identity - is bigger than ever. The EU, which in recent years has split up over sexual rights, continues to have the same, shared position on including SRHR in the text. So we are ready! Let week 2 begin.... 

= Joni van de Sand, WO=MEN = 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Women’s Rights Caucus Statement – Protect Women and Girls by upholding the Beijing Declaration

  The Women’s Rights Caucus, representing over 900 feminist advocates from around the world, urges you to oppose the proposed US draft resolution entitled  “Protection of women and girls through appropriate terminology.” Despite the title, we do not feel protected nor represented by this initiative. Download this statement as pdf.   Download this statement in Spanish.   On the heels of the first-ever recorded vote on the agreed conclusions of the annual meetings of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, and in complete disregard of the significant opposition their proposal got in the negotiation room, the United States has circulated a new resolution proposal which attempts to falsely state that the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action agreed that  “gender” was defined as “men and women”. It attributes to annex IV of the Report of the Fourth World Conference of Women a meaning that was never agreed by Member States, effectively rewriting th...

ARTivism for Change: Creativity as Resistance at CSW69

Artwork "Who can I trust with my story?" from ArtVism in Uganda During the 69th CSW, the Our Voices Our Futures (OVOF) consortium organised a creative ARTivism for Change space where bold protest sign-making, intimate film screenings, and thought-provoking feminist dialogues blended together. Over two days, March 12 and 13, 2025, artists, activists, and allies transformed the space into dynamic real-life canvases of empowerment, solidarity, and cultural and political resistance.   In the main space of the Blue Gallery participants engaged with various stations, including Button Making , Journaling with Art , Drawing , and Protest Sign Making . Participants moved between activities, creating powerful messages of resistance and hope. The creativity extended beyond the activities themselves. Access Denied The ACCESS DENIED campaign , initiated by WO=MEN, was set up to be a photo installation. It highlights the deep gap between the inclusive vision set forth at the 1995 Beijing ...

"Beat back the radicals!"

“We will beat back the radicals and we will fight all their falsehoods and we will help as best we can all the faithful UN delegations trying to help the unborn child. But, the Friday Fax and our presence at UN headquarters is not free. In fact, it is terribly expensive. Would you be able to make a sacrificial donation to our work of $500? $100? $50?” This quote is from a newsletter of an American based organization working to stop any agreement at the UN that might possibly be understood to mean that women can have a choice in their  reproduction. It is quite ironic to see the violence in the language, beat back the radicals, from a group who are working at the UN meeting devoted to ending Violence Against Women. Being here at the UN makes you feel in your body and soul that maintaining and advancing freedom of choice for women (and men) is a battle and not everyone fights fair. Some of our Dutch civil society friends attended a panel in which the two main speakers where ...