‘Why are you
here? Why are you still at the CSW when the end document is already been adopted!?’
The journalist asking me this
sounds sincerely surprised. I could tell her this is because of the numerous
interesting side and parallel events that are still scheduled for the next 9
days. Or because of the opportunity to exchange thoughts and strategies with civil
society colleagues from around the world. Or to recharge my ‘activist-battery’ with
the moving and inspiring individuals and their stories from grass-root level. For
those moments when I need to be reminded what it is we are all working so hard
for.
All those would be very
true reasons. Very honest reasons as well. But there is ONE main reason why I
am still here, and with me so many other Women’s Human Rights activists and civil
society representatives….: because we are negotiating the future of our voice,
our space, here at the CSW.
The international
civil society advocates for a firmly-rooted participative role and recognition of
our expertise as women’s and feminist organizations and groups. We have played
a critical role in the run up and in creating the Beijing agenda that was developed
20 years. The regional and global review reports of Beijng+20 amongst others
show that progress on gender quality and empowerment of women and girls that
has been achieved since 1995 would have been impossible without us. There is
invaluable knowledge drawing from our closeness to the ground. We are able to
identify trends that negatively affect women or undermine gender equality
before governments do. Governments can use our expertise in ensuring that the work
of the Commission remains relevant and impactful.
Unfortunately,
inclusion of our role is not obvious. Several member states or groups of member
states at the CSW, with Russia as the most focal force, are opposing the
inclusion of civil society to be incorporated into the Working Methods.
We are lucky. ‘We’
being the Netherlands’ civil society. Historically we have a good relationship
with our government representatives. We can share our concerns and enter into
dialogue with our head of delegation and delegation representatives. Which is exactly
what we did yesterday, during a meeting of Netherlands’ civil society at the
Dutch embassy to the United Nations. Where we met not only with the Dutch Minister, but also the Ministers of Aruba and St Maarten. Several member organizations of WO=MEN flagged
up critical issues: decent work and women’s workers rights; implementation of a
financing framework for UNSCR1325; increasing violent extremisms; shrinking
political space for civil society in general and particularly for LBTI and
other groups; and also the shrinking financial space for civil society organizations
working on gender equality. Critical issues that were acknowledged by Minister
Bussemaker, Netherlands’ Ministry for Education, Culture and Science. The
Netherlands has took to heart the shrinking space for civil society. It was
therefore a confirmation of our partnership when the Minister closed her
official statement later that afternoon at the General Assembly with a
commitment on continuous collaboration with civil society.
Hopefully the
Netherlands’ openness of the delegation and government to work with civil
society will be held as an example for those governments where civil society
inclusion is not guaranteed. This is why I am still here, at the CSW. Why we
are still here. To make sure that the CSW Working Methods guarantee that Women’s
Human Rights activists all around the world are able to let their voice be
heard at the CSW. Now and in the years to come.
=
Posted by Sanne Holtslag on behalf of WO=MEN Dutch Gender Platform =
Comments