Skip to main content

Some interesting paragraphs in the new draft


Today the government delegations went through the new version of the draft agreed conclusions (see 2 posts back). The draft continues to be a strong one, thanks to the good 0 draft that we started out with. Below follows a selection of some of the key paragraphs. I have tried to add some new issues that I did not write about previously.

(This is just a selection, as there is so much to discuss. Another update will follow tomorrow morning)



Intimate partner violence
Currently there are six references in the text to “domestic and intimate partner violence”. How it is crucial that intimate partner violence remains in the text. Why? One of the reasons I already explained in a previous post. The other is that “domestic” only refers to partners living together in the same house. Whereas partner violence also takes place in relationships between people who do nót live together, for example between couples who are dating. 

5 bis. [The Commission recognizes the important role of the family in combating violence against women and girls, including domestic violence and intimate partner violence, and the need to support its capacity to prevent and eliminate all forms of violence against women and girls. It recognizes that domestic violence remains widespread and affects women of all social strata across the world and the need to eliminate such violence.]

For example the Holy See, Russia, Singapore(!)  and the African Group want to have the reference to intimate partner violence out. The EU, Switzerland, Norway, Brazil and Turkey are strongly in favour, with Turkey adding to modify family to “families”, because there are different types of families including single parent and child headed household. This is agreed language from Beijing para 29.


Femicide/feminicide
This can be defined as “the murder of women because they are women”. This has been included in the text thanks to the strong voices of women from Latin America, particularly Mexico. The term is included in the text 4 times. In paragraph New 7 sext supra it is recognized; b ter) calls to adopt laws to punish it; j bis) calls for standardization to investigate it; hh bis) calls for police records and the judiciary to collect statistic and disaggregated data. Some countries (Pakistan, Russia) have said today they want to make this region specific because it does not take place everywhere. Whereas the EU is happy it is included in the text, and the Latin American countries have stressed that while “feminicide” may be a term coming from their region, the killing of women because they are women happens everywhere.


Women, peace and security
There’s a whole bunch of language in the text for those of you working on UNSCR1325/1820 issues. This para is a strong one and located on the first page of the text:

2 ter Facilitator’s proposal (combined with 8 bis): The Commission recalls the inclusion of gender-related crimes and crimes of sexual violence in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, as well as the recognition by the ad hoc international criminal tribunals that rape and other forms of sexual violence can constitute a war crime, a crime against humanity or a constitutive act with respect to genocide or torture. It also recalls the contribution of the ad hoc international criminal tribunals to ending impunity, by ensuring accountability and punishing perpetrators of violence against women.

See also paragraphs d) referring to security council resolutions; d quat), d quin) to end impunity.


Right to mobility and own property
A strong and of additional value paragraph has been proposed by Turkey and Jordan, hurray! They will work on it the coming day(s):

m quin) [Refrain/desist from using [wrongful] social justifications for denying women their basic rights including the right to travel, the right to own property and the right to be protected by criminal law on an equal basis with men / freedom of movement/right to mobility/ right to own property and the right to the equal protection of the law]; (Turkey to work with Jordan)



= Joni van de Sand = 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CSW Revitalisation conversations in the region

  Photo: Facilitation team (Liliane Nkunzimana, Lopa Banerjee, Nadia van der Linde, Ivy Koek) What do you think about when you hear countries are committed to 'revitalize' the UN Commission on the  Status of Women (CSW)? "Oh, is it dying?" is one of the responses I've gotten, as if the CSW is holding on to its last straws at the moment, in desparate need of resuscitation. The challenges ahead for the current multilateral system, as well as for many of our national governments, are huge. In order to give gender equality and the rights of all women and girls a bit more of a boost, UN Women has been encouraging countries to commit to a process to 'revitalize' the CSW. And now that this has indeed been taken on board by governments from around the world in the recent Pact for the Future, the conversation is moving to: So what does that mean? During the NGO Forum in Geneva that took place just prior to the UNECE Beijing+30 Regional Review in October 2024 I co-f...
Post a Comment
Read more

The CSW68 is a wrap!

  Met Nederlands ambassadeur en CSW Facilitator Yoka Brandt op de foto na afloop van de CSW68 “We have reservations on the text. We don’t have instructions to proceed to adoption .” After seven days of negotiations at the UN during this year’s Commission on the Status of Women (CSW), Nigeria almost blocked the negotiated outcome document from being adopted. Almost, because after some formal and informal interventions in Conference Room 4, the Nigerian delegate, flanked by the Dutch Ambassador Yoka Brandt, added: “I now have instructions to support the adoption.” On the balcony filled with civil society as well as in the plenary room there was a clear sigh of relief followed by enthusiastic applause, hugging and photo taking. We have Agreed Conclusions ! Early negotiations As usual, the CSW negotiations process started early February with a Zero Draft , developed by UN Women and the CSW Bureau. And with input and inspiration taken from the Secretary General Report. For the EU...
Post a Comment
Read more

CSW68 Youth Dialogue statement by Fenna Timsi

  Dutch youth representative Fenna Timsi gives her statement in the CSW68 Youth Dialogue On Thursday afternoon, 14 March 2024, the Dutch youth representative Fenna Timsi gave her statement in the CSW68 Youth Dialogue inside the UN. The reflections from several participants of this year's Youth Dialogue - the second ever as part of the CSW - were that it has much improved compared to last year. Importantly, many more of the people who were given the floor were actually young people themselves. Many of the statements were rich and relevant in content with clear and important messages for the government delegates in the other room in the UN who had started the negotiations for the outcome document. Read Fenna's statement below or see the full Youth Dialogue here (Fenna's statement is at 1:20:10). Dear all,   As the Dutch UN Youth Representative, I thank you to speak independently on behalf of young people in the Netherlands, not on behalf of the government. I spoke to many yo...
Post a Comment
Read more