Skip to main content

Day 2 at the 47th CPD... first day of negotiations

It’s 9 pm, our fellow advocates just managed to get food into the UN to feed the hardworking advocates, and we are still on! As we lost one day yesterday with the suspension of the negotiations, we have to continue till late today.

The delegates gathered this morning at 10 am in the General Assembly, a big enough room to house all the delegates including their NGO representatives on the delegation. Negotiations started about the 14-page text that was laid on the table after the informals last week Thursday and Friday.

As it is now 9 pm, the delegates discussed eight Preambular Paragraphs, and have now reached the third Operation Paragraph. A short update, at a very general level, that does no right to all the complex dynamics in the different regions:

Unfortunately, several African countries have continued to resist the negotiated outcome document with substantive content. Their idea is that the document should only be a Procedural Resolution and should not include new commitments for instance on sexual rights, abortion, sexual orientation and gender identity and other sensitive issues. Countries that lead this conservative tone are Egypt, Nigeria and Cameroon. It’s very important that other African countries speak up, because there are many that are actually not conservative. Luckily this happened in the course of the day, when the delegations from Ghana and Swaziland did some progressive proposals. However, the tactic of the conservative countries at the moment seems to introduce so many new paragraphs, that negotiations are delayed and the document looses its strengths. 

The Holy See plays it predictable and usual role by rejecting anything that includes rights… especially sexual and reproductive rights, as they associate this with abortion. On the other hand, they are keen on including language on the 'family'. The Arab Group is very much on the same line. Egypt even got as far as challenging the whole basis and relevance of the CPD!

However, there are also brave and strong champions. These include South-Africa, Brazil and Argentina, as well as Philippines and Nepal. We are particularly pleased with that, as this shows that countries from the Global South propose progressive language and that SRHR is really not something that comes from the Global North.

As we advocates are enjoying our food, we have actually only one more hour to go before the delegates will call it a day. At the moment, the Netherlands (our own Hilde Kroes) is speaking on behalf of a great number of progressive countries in and outside Europe, to support their earlier proposed language on SRHR and the link with economic, environmental and social dimensions of development, and the link with post-2015. Keeping our fingers crossed!

by Rineke van Dam, Public Affairs Officer SRHR at Simavi


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Women’s Rights Caucus Statement – Protect Women and Girls by upholding the Beijing Declaration

  The Women’s Rights Caucus, representing over 900 feminist advocates from around the world, urges you to oppose the proposed US draft resolution entitled  “Protection of women and girls through appropriate terminology.” Despite the title, we do not feel protected nor represented by this initiative. Download this statement as pdf.   Download this statement in Spanish.   On the heels of the first-ever recorded vote on the agreed conclusions of the annual meetings of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, and in complete disregard of the significant opposition their proposal got in the negotiation room, the United States has circulated a new resolution proposal which attempts to falsely state that the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action agreed that  “gender” was defined as “men and women”. It attributes to annex IV of the Report of the Fourth World Conference of Women a meaning that was never agreed by Member States, effectively rewriting th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Blog van ngo-vertegenwoordiger Joyce Brummelman: de onderhandelingen

Ngo-vertegenwoordiger Joyce Brummelman met Benjamin Nolan van de PV in de VN Deze week was het eindelijk zover: mijn reis naar de Verenigde Naties om van dichtbij te volgen hoe de afspraken en onderhandelingen rondom de Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) steeds meer vorm krijgen. Access to justice – toegang tot het recht – klinkt misschien als één thema, maar in werkelijkheid bestaat het uit talloze dimensies. Elk land heeft een andere juridische werkelijkheid, andere barrières, andere verhalen. Als NGO vertegenwoordiger mocht ik deze discussies mede volgen en luisteren naar wat landen, experts en activisten hierover te zeggen hebben.   Ondanks de sneeuwstorm landde ik dinsdagmiddag in New York en ging ik direct door naar de Nederlandse Vertegenwoordiging van de Verenigde Naties. Daar hoorde ik hoe Nederland werkt aan een zo sterk mogelijke uitkomst van de CSW: ambitieus, principieel en met oog voor de realiteit van vrouwen en meisjes wereldwijd. De aftrap: landen in gesprek o...
Post a Comment
Read more

"Beat back the radicals!"

“We will beat back the radicals and we will fight all their falsehoods and we will help as best we can all the faithful UN delegations trying to help the unborn child. But, the Friday Fax and our presence at UN headquarters is not free. In fact, it is terribly expensive. Would you be able to make a sacrificial donation to our work of $500? $100? $50?” This quote is from a newsletter of an American based organization working to stop any agreement at the UN that might possibly be understood to mean that women can have a choice in their  reproduction. It is quite ironic to see the violence in the language, beat back the radicals, from a group who are working at the UN meeting devoted to ending Violence Against Women. Being here at the UN makes you feel in your body and soul that maintaining and advancing freedom of choice for women (and men) is a battle and not everyone fights fair. Some of our Dutch civil society friends attended a panel in which the two main speakers where ...
4 comments
Read more