Skip to main content

CSW68 Pitch: Ensure a fair economic system and a gender-transformative and intersectional approach to combating poverty

 



During the CSW ngo-briefing on the 22nd of januari 2024, pitches were given to the Dutch CSW68 delegation with recommendations from the civil society. They had a clear message: involve us and listen to the insights of people living in poverty to work towards the goal of equal rights more effectively. 

 
Artemis Westenberg, chair of Vrouwenbelangen, speaks on the importance of a gendertransformative and intersectional approach to combatting poverty.  

 

”I present to you here what the poor, most of them women, told me they needed most when I asked them via X. Their answers, showing great insight in their plight, poured in over mere hours. It showed me, again, that the poor do not lack brains, they lack money and opportunity. If they are coloured, sick, low education, single parent, then their problems compound. 

 

What they want is: - Equal treatment as meant by Article 1 of the Constitution of the Netherlands; which means every municipality executes the laws governing poverty in the same humane way.

- Trust, respect, dignity, agency. The lack to attain of all that depends on a government that sets the tone and the execution of the Dutch laws with those qualities foremost enforced. - Equality also means the right to receive a birthday gift; the right to eat at a friend’s house, or even to eat regularly with another poor citizen to combat loneliness and be more frugal with your budget. All rights that the non-poor have, on any given day. - Allow people to be assisted by others, as  a caring society should not exist only if you are wealthy enough. Again, rights that anyone else, non poor, does have. - Allow people to have savings of at least 1500 euro extra in their bank account to be self-reliant.  - Most of the financial problems would melt away with a guaranteed basic income, eliminating the stifling, nay killing, control by civil servants. - The debt-industry needs to be tightly regulated, in order for the poor to have a hope in hell to ever leave their poverty behind. This regulation needs to include the government agencies who are too quickly increasing the debt with fines. 


Access is a problem: - Housing that is affordable and liveable in light of heating, and cooling, costs. - Equality and equity can only be attained in a society that does not allow age-discrimination. - Politicians and civil servants have little to no knowledge, and understanding, what too little income does to the citizens they are purported to serve – they must be educated by the poor.


Several areas where the cost of the service for the poor (or perhaps for all citizens) should be nill: - Public transport that is truly affordable for the poor, or free, as loneliness is felt as a punishment for being poor, besides loneliness is bad for your health, physically and mentally. Free public transport; It would ensure the opportunity to see friends and family. - Healthcare that is affordable, which definitely means no co-pays for medicine, no co-pay of €385 for health care as healthcare should not be dependent on money but on health concerns. - Healthcare that includes dental care to keep their heart health and their smiles possible.  - Free child care to ensure access to education and work for the poor, and for everyone else a cap of 150 euros per month. - No VAT on feminine hygiene products – and a cap on the prices of said products. - No VAT on fruit and vegetables, including frozen vegetables and fruit. - The right to pay in cash, as research has proven time and again that it is easier to keep within your budget by paying with cash. 


All in all, two reasons for poverty stood out which can be summed up by the way we view our society and citizens:  

1. Our Capitalist system based on an inordinate belief in market forces fixing anything and everything &

2. Our Calvinistic prejudice as a society seeing ‘personal guilt’ as the basis for poverty. Everything is always your own fault. 

 

Lastly: Remember being poor is not a lack of character but a lack of cash! 

 

See all the Dutch civil society's CSW68 recommendations here, in Dutch and English. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The CSW68 is a wrap!

  Met Nederlands ambassadeur en CSW Facilitator Yoka Brandt op de foto na afloop van de CSW68 “We have reservations on the text. We don’t have instructions to proceed to adoption .” After seven days of negotiations at the UN during this year’s Commission on the Status of Women (CSW), Nigeria almost blocked the negotiated outcome document from being adopted. Almost, because after some formal and informal interventions in Conference Room 4, the Nigerian delegate, flanked by the Dutch Ambassador Yoka Brandt, added: “I now have instructions to support the adoption.” On the balcony filled with civil society as well as in the plenary room there was a clear sigh of relief followed by enthusiastic applause, hugging and photo taking. We have Agreed Conclusions ! Early negotiations As usual, the CSW negotiations process started early February with a Zero Draft , developed by UN Women and the CSW Bureau. And with input and inspiration taken from the Secretary General Report. For the EU, as

CSW68 Youth Dialogue statement by Fenna Timsi

  Dutch youth representative Fenna Timsi gives her statement in the CSW68 Youth Dialogue On Thursday afternoon, 14 March 2024, the Dutch youth representative Fenna Timsi gave her statement in the CSW68 Youth Dialogue inside the UN. The reflections from several participants of this year's Youth Dialogue - the second ever as part of the CSW - were that it has much improved compared to last year. Importantly, many more of the people who were given the floor were actually young people themselves. Many of the statements were rich and relevant in content with clear and important messages for the government delegates in the other room in the UN who had started the negotiations for the outcome document. Read Fenna's statement below or see the full Youth Dialogue here (Fenna's statement is at 1:20:10). Dear all,   As the Dutch UN Youth Representative, I thank you to speak independently on behalf of young people in the Netherlands, not on behalf of the government. I spoke to many yo

Blog #4 by Sanne: We need progress on Loss & Damage!

Today the CSW’s main outcome document, the Agreed Conclusions, continued. At this CSW66, it is not only essential that we move forward on gender equality issues, but also on climate, environmental and disaster-risk reduction action! We need to connect to existing discussions in different UN-spaces to ensure that our discussions here in New York strengthen our intersectional, transformative climate action and that gender equality is central. Because we want this CSW to ensure that we deal with environmental & climate crises as coherently and strongly as possible. We can’t wait any longer!