Skip to main content

Finding Powerful Friends on Menopause Care

Deze blogpost is geschreven door Artemis Westenberg. Ze schrijft een hele serie blogs voor de NVR over haar dagen in New York voor de 69ste CSW, te lezen op de NVR website


I am famous here. Well, that is perhaps too big a statement, but people definitely recognise and acknowledge me in the corridors and side events. Bear with me and it will become clear.

Like last year, for me the CSW side events started with the Israeli side event ‘Resilience and Courage in Times of Conflict.’ Like last year also, the representative of Israel to the UN, ambassador Danny Danon, like ambassador Gilad Erdan before him, whom I see speaking in the UN on internet snippets, became a real life person that was just passing close to me. I am pretty sure that these ambassadors value their task and position, but probably do not view themselves as famous. However, they are, and not just to me. Unlike last year, I didn’t have to sneak in to a closed, only for registered people, Israeli event, but could simply walk in with several co-boardmembers of the International Alliance of Women. The discussion was interesting, even if sometimes heartbreaking.

The next big event, in a very big room, the ECOSOC Chamber boasting 581 seats, was were I became ‘famous’. Those of you that have followed my blogs before know that I am partial to Side Events organised by the Nordic Council of Ministers. It is not just the openess of the panel discussions, the closeness to what we in the Netherlands consider to be ‘normal’ approaches of societal ills, but most of all the approachability of those ministers for obtaining honest answers after the event.  The theme of the event was ‘Pushing for Progress’ to oppose the backlash of the ‘barefoot and pregnant’ is what women should be opinion in the USA and elsewhere. I bided my time while the moderator, a superb moderator who kept the discussion interesting and flowing, led the event into ‘question time’. My time.

I stood up, raised my arm with my phone in it, and kept standing. As I had been sitting second row behind the chairs at the microphoned desks, also quite far up the rafters of the room, I knew that being acknowlegded and posing my question on menopause would be hard. But 'nothing ventured, nothing gained', so up I stayed waving my arm. The moderator noticed me while the first questioner stumbled through her query, and I was granted the floor. Reaching around the person at the desk, I opened the microphone and stated that I represented the Dutch Women’s Rights organisation and the Dutch National Women’s Council and that I was beyond childbearing years and so needed menopause care. Did the Nordic Countries offer that, and if so, could they help my Dutch government to offer the same to the women in the Netherlands.

I have asked many questions in side events over the years, that were well received, but never, absolutely never have I been gifted with a full room loudly applauding my query. Added to that, the moderator declared it the most important question to be asked, which she herself definitely wanted answers from the ministers for. And that is how I am now recognised in the corridors and the events as ‘the woman who asked the question about menopause care’.

The ministers of Sweden and Iceland specifically answered my question and stressed the need for menopause care. Therefore, I sought them out after the event ended, and secured their support for a ‘menopause side event’ next year at the CSW together with the Netherlands. The moderator declared that she would love to moderate that event. In all, I just have to tell our Dutch government now where they must show up for their side event in 2026.

Besides the support of the Nordic Countries’ ministers, I gained the support of the Danish Women’s Council, of the Australian organisations and many other countries that sought me out to start coordinating world-wide demand for proper menopause care for women-through-their-life-course.

As the ECOSOC room had another interesting event on ‘#StopOnlineViolence’ by Luxembourg and the Council of Europe I stayed in the room, but descended to the desks that often have the overflow of speakers of the event. I happened to meet a space-relation from Italy at these seats, Silvia from the G100 Space group.

A good discussion ensued on how the digital age has brought a lot of digital stalking, digital harrassment and threats to women, especially to women politicians. Stricter monitoring and better laws to protect women on the internet were the proposed solutions, which are already in place in a number of countries. As last speaker the prime minister of Aruba, seated only a few seats away from me at the ring of lower desks in the room, gave her story about how on the small island of Aruba, where everyone knows everyone, cyber stalking makes the digital and real life of female politicians, but also of women in general, very unpleasant. As the prime minister was so close by, I complimented her, in Dutch, on her speech and commiserated with her on the problem being exacerbated when a community is small. Everyone knows where you live. Everyone knows where your children attend school. It makes for a truly unsafe environment for women politicians.

Tired, and rather happy, I left for dinner and a good night’s rest in my home on Manhattan, to prepare for another day at the CSW. For the briefing at the Embassy of the Netherlands to the UN, where I will present to Mariëlle Paul, our minister of Emancipation, my case on Menopause Care in the Netherlands.

by Artemis Westenberg, Vrouwenbelangen en Nederlandse VrouwenRaad (NVR)



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Women’s Rights Caucus Statement – Protect Women and Girls by upholding the Beijing Declaration

  The Women’s Rights Caucus, representing over 900 feminist advocates from around the world, urges you to oppose the proposed US draft resolution entitled  “Protection of women and girls through appropriate terminology.” Despite the title, we do not feel protected nor represented by this initiative. Download this statement as pdf.   Download this statement in Spanish.   On the heels of the first-ever recorded vote on the agreed conclusions of the annual meetings of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, and in complete disregard of the significant opposition their proposal got in the negotiation room, the United States has circulated a new resolution proposal which attempts to falsely state that the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action agreed that  “gender” was defined as “men and women”. It attributes to annex IV of the Report of the Fourth World Conference of Women a meaning that was never agreed by Member States, effectively rewriting th...

ARTivism for Change: Creativity as Resistance at CSW69

Artwork "Who can I trust with my story?" from ArtVism in Uganda During the 69th CSW, the Our Voices Our Futures (OVOF) consortium organised a creative ARTivism for Change space where bold protest sign-making, intimate film screenings, and thought-provoking feminist dialogues blended together. Over two days, March 12 and 13, 2025, artists, activists, and allies transformed the space into dynamic real-life canvases of empowerment, solidarity, and cultural and political resistance.   In the main space of the Blue Gallery participants engaged with various stations, including Button Making , Journaling with Art , Drawing , and Protest Sign Making . Participants moved between activities, creating powerful messages of resistance and hope. The creativity extended beyond the activities themselves. Access Denied The ACCESS DENIED campaign , initiated by WO=MEN, was set up to be a photo installation. It highlights the deep gap between the inclusive vision set forth at the 1995 Beijing ...

"Beat back the radicals!"

“We will beat back the radicals and we will fight all their falsehoods and we will help as best we can all the faithful UN delegations trying to help the unborn child. But, the Friday Fax and our presence at UN headquarters is not free. In fact, it is terribly expensive. Would you be able to make a sacrificial donation to our work of $500? $100? $50?” This quote is from a newsletter of an American based organization working to stop any agreement at the UN that might possibly be understood to mean that women can have a choice in their  reproduction. It is quite ironic to see the violence in the language, beat back the radicals, from a group who are working at the UN meeting devoted to ending Violence Against Women. Being here at the UN makes you feel in your body and soul that maintaining and advancing freedom of choice for women (and men) is a battle and not everyone fights fair. Some of our Dutch civil society friends attended a panel in which the two main speakers where ...