Skip to main content

The role of the CSW in times of militarisation

Nada de Murashkin gives an oral statement at the CSW69

There are so many times during the CSW that I have felt touched by fierceness and also care of women (including trans and non-binary babes). My experience has been of such support these days at the CSW. And I especially felt this on a personal level yesterday. 

Just the evening before, I was informed I would have an opportunity to give a civil society briefing at the High-Level Interactive Dialogue on Accelerating Implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action: The Role of the Commission on the Status of Women. After some initial panic at the short notice, I mentioned it at the NGO briefing organised by WO=MEN with the Dutch delegation in the morning. Immediately numerous women jumped up to volunteer to share their wisdom and insight. 

A couple of hours later I had my statement ready and was sitting with other women from civil society, waiting for our turn to speak. Some were calm and chatty, sharing notes on what we would say, others were so nervous they were shaking. But each of us sitting there kept telling each other as we were called up one by one, “you got this”, “you can do it”, “just breathe”, “you’ll be amazing”. And when I got called up to the hot seat I could see my new friends and colleagues from the other Dutch NGOs on the sides cheering me on. I admit, it is slightly intimidating, but also actually a lot of fun. And just such a nice feeling, not just having the opportunity to make an intervention, but to do so while being cheered on by a hype squad of women I didn’t even know. This is the sistahood I love (*I mean that in the most inclusive way).

Below is my statement.

High-Level Interactive Dialogue on Accelerating Implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action: The Role of the Commission on the Status of Women
Tuesday, 18 March 2025, 3:00 to 6:00 PM

I am speaking today on behalf of the Strengthening Civil Courage Alliance, representing PAX, ABAAD, Amnesty and Defend Defenders, as well as partners in 14 countries across Africa and the Middle East. I am also speaking from a seat of privilege. Many women who should be sitting here, are not. Due to visa issues linked to gender discrimination, economic reasons, status and safety concerns amongst others.

Having lived and worked in many conflict-affected areas, such as Darfur and Ukraine, I'm deeply concerned with the rising level of armed violence. There are currently more than 120 armed conflicts worldwide. It is women from these conflict-affected areas, most impacted that should be here. Together with indigenous peoples, and those with disabilities, minority sexual and gender identities, and others who are structurally and historically marginalised.

These women should be here, not just as observers and advisors to provide their civil society briefings, but as key decisionmakers. While Beijing Platform for Action (BPfA) called for the participation of women back in 1995, the reality is, 30 years later, many are still excluded. As such, I call on CSW to reduce barriers and establish rotating regional hosting, prioritising hosting in the global majority.

Women and girls bear the brunt of conflicts worldwide, as well as continue to face systemic inequality, especially with the renewed efforts of various governments to reduce rights. Truly feminist leadership would require gender mainstreaming across all foreign policy commitments, and I call on the CSW to link the BPfA to investment in peacebuilding and conflict prevention rather than military expenditure.

We are seeing a devastating peak in conflict-related sexual violence and casualties. The current anti-gender backlash, rise in authoritarianism, increase in armed conflicts and highest ever military spending are interconnected and deeply gendered.

It is time to reclaim the roots of the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda. As such, I call on CSW to address the deeply entrenched structural issue of militarisation, driven by dominant masculinity norms and patriarchal power structures. One way to address this is to ensure more robust accountability mechanisms to track this commitment to “reduce excessive military expenditure, control the availability of armaments, and promote non-violent forms of conflict resolution” as identified in the BPfA as key areas to promote women’s rights and gender equality.

This would do justice to the BPfA and make inclusive feminist peace possible.

By Nada de Murashkin (she/her), PAX

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Women’s Rights Caucus Statement – Protect Women and Girls by upholding the Beijing Declaration

  The Women’s Rights Caucus, representing over 900 feminist advocates from around the world, urges you to oppose the proposed US draft resolution entitled  “Protection of women and girls through appropriate terminology.” Despite the title, we do not feel protected nor represented by this initiative. Download this statement as pdf.   Download this statement in Spanish.   On the heels of the first-ever recorded vote on the agreed conclusions of the annual meetings of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, and in complete disregard of the significant opposition their proposal got in the negotiation room, the United States has circulated a new resolution proposal which attempts to falsely state that the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action agreed that  “gender” was defined as “men and women”. It attributes to annex IV of the Report of the Fourth World Conference of Women a meaning that was never agreed by Member States, effectively rewriting th...
Post a Comment
Read more

ARTivism for Change: Creativity as Resistance at CSW69

Artwork "Who can I trust with my story?" from ArtVism in Uganda During the 69th CSW, the Our Voices Our Futures (OVOF) consortium organised a creative ARTivism for Change space where bold protest sign-making, intimate film screenings, and thought-provoking feminist dialogues blended together. Over two days, March 12 and 13, 2025, artists, activists, and allies transformed the space into dynamic real-life canvases of empowerment, solidarity, and cultural and political resistance.   In the main space of the Blue Gallery participants engaged with various stations, including Button Making , Journaling with Art , Drawing , and Protest Sign Making . Participants moved between activities, creating powerful messages of resistance and hope. The creativity extended beyond the activities themselves. Access Denied The ACCESS DENIED campaign , initiated by WO=MEN, was set up to be a photo installation. It highlights the deep gap between the inclusive vision set forth at the 1995 Beijing ...
Post a Comment
Read more

"Beat back the radicals!"

“We will beat back the radicals and we will fight all their falsehoods and we will help as best we can all the faithful UN delegations trying to help the unborn child. But, the Friday Fax and our presence at UN headquarters is not free. In fact, it is terribly expensive. Would you be able to make a sacrificial donation to our work of $500? $100? $50?” This quote is from a newsletter of an American based organization working to stop any agreement at the UN that might possibly be understood to mean that women can have a choice in their  reproduction. It is quite ironic to see the violence in the language, beat back the radicals, from a group who are working at the UN meeting devoted to ending Violence Against Women. Being here at the UN makes you feel in your body and soul that maintaining and advancing freedom of choice for women (and men) is a battle and not everyone fights fair. Some of our Dutch civil society friends attended a panel in which the two main speakers where ...
4 comments
Read more