Skip to main content

Blog #4 by Sanne: We need progress on Loss & Damage!

Today the CSW’s main outcome document, the Agreed Conclusions, continued. At this CSW66, it is not only essential that we move forward on gender equality issues, but also on climate, environmental and disaster-risk reduction action! We need to connect to existing discussions in different UN-spaces to ensure that our discussions here in New York strengthen our intersectional, transformative climate action and that gender equality is central. Because we want this CSW to ensure that we deal with environmental & climate crises as coherently and strongly as possible. We can’t wait any longer!

 
Unfortunately, many countries and groups do not agree with us. We face ‘expected opposition’ from conservative countries in terms of human-rights language, references to diversity, and intersectional approaches. These countries or country-groups include, for example Saudi Arabia, Russia, African Group, CARICOM (Caribbean states), Holy See (Vatican), and others.

Other groups that we usually see as our allies in the CSW space, are not our allies in making progress on climate and environmental issues. Groups like the EU, Mountains Group and others, seem to only be willing to take exact textual references to existing climate language. This means mostly referring to outcomes of annual climate summits, COPs, like the Glasgow Climate Pact (2021) and Paris Agreement (2015). 

This is problematic. 

The Glasgow Climate Pact and Paris Agreement are not gender-transformative agreements. By sticking to agreements made in a highly contested space, we will not move forward.

One of the key issues that is currently highly contested, is loss and damage.


What is loss & damage?

The climate and environmental crises are already leading to disastrous impacts for many communities, specifically in the Global South. They are extended beyond their capacities and abilities to adapt, and also exacerbate existing inequalities. It is more than just the impacts of extreme weather events and slow onset climate change. It’s species extinction, loss of land, biodiversity and ecosystems, and loss of cultural heritage, indigenous and local knowledge.

It’s also the effects of loss of harvest or access to water on women in all their diversity, who are often (because of existing unequal gender roles) responsible for a majority of these tasks. Their daily lives and livelihoods are directly affected.

This needs to be addressed. It has been a struggle to get this topic on the agenda at climate negotiations, and progress is hardly made. We were extremely disappointed with the outcomes of COP26 Glasgow. The creation of a Loss and Damage fund to compensate communities who have already lost their homes and livelihoods from floods, droughts, heatwaves and rising sea levels did not get the green light from several countries. Commitments to finance Loss & Damage were once again pushed forward to COP27, let alone that gender dimensions were part of the discussions!

This is where CSW66 can make a difference! 

We call on ALL governments to support making a change, because women in all their diversity all around the globe cannot wait any longer.



The Agreed Conclusions of CSW66 therefore must:

  • Explicitly articulate support for sufficient and needs-based action, including finance, on loss and damage that centers the most marginalized peoples and communities, especially women and girls, in addressing unavoidable climate impacts.

  • Increase funding for loss and damage, including through the creation of a specific financing facility to address loss and damage as well as broad macroeconomic policy change including the cancellation of sovereign debt.

  • Strengthen capacity building and technology transfer and invest in locally led solutions to support the leadership of women, girls, and youth, in all their diversity, on loss and damage.

  • Indicate the importance of a clear governance structure to complement financing for loss and damage, including through the full rights-compliant operationalization of the Santiago Network. The network must be allocated sufficient resources to foster a genuine space for exchange of strategies and support for gender-just and rights-based solutions and mechanisms for effective remedies at scale, engaging with diverse views and centering future generations, to address loss and damage at national level.

  • Recognize the urgency of improving gender disaggregated data collection and analysis around loss and damage, including by prioritizing the voices of women and LGBTQIA+ individuals in this field.

  • Call for the publication of a Loss and Damage Gap Report to generate a reliable, disaggregated assessment of loss and damage, finance needs and existing funding. This must include a strong focus on assessing the gender dimensions of loss and damage.



Feminist allies in the Pacific have launched a strong campaign on loss & damage which many of us are supporting. Check out the images in this post and more here: https://twitter.com/CSW66Pacific


* Blog by Sanne Van de Voort, ngo representative in the Dutch CSW delegation

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Women’s Rights Caucus Statement – Protect Women and Girls by upholding the Beijing Declaration

  The Women’s Rights Caucus, representing over 900 feminist advocates from around the world, urges you to oppose the proposed US draft resolution entitled  “Protection of women and girls through appropriate terminology.” Despite the title, we do not feel protected nor represented by this initiative. Download this statement as pdf.   Download this statement in Spanish.   On the heels of the first-ever recorded vote on the agreed conclusions of the annual meetings of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, and in complete disregard of the significant opposition their proposal got in the negotiation room, the United States has circulated a new resolution proposal which attempts to falsely state that the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action agreed that  “gender” was defined as “men and women”. It attributes to annex IV of the Report of the Fourth World Conference of Women a meaning that was never agreed by Member States, effectively rewriting th...
Post a Comment
Read more

ARTivism for Change: Creativity as Resistance at CSW69

Artwork "Who can I trust with my story?" from ArtVism in Uganda During the 69th CSW, the Our Voices Our Futures (OVOF) consortium organised a creative ARTivism for Change space where bold protest sign-making, intimate film screenings, and thought-provoking feminist dialogues blended together. Over two days, March 12 and 13, 2025, artists, activists, and allies transformed the space into dynamic real-life canvases of empowerment, solidarity, and cultural and political resistance.   In the main space of the Blue Gallery participants engaged with various stations, including Button Making , Journaling with Art , Drawing , and Protest Sign Making . Participants moved between activities, creating powerful messages of resistance and hope. The creativity extended beyond the activities themselves. Access Denied The ACCESS DENIED campaign , initiated by WO=MEN, was set up to be a photo installation. It highlights the deep gap between the inclusive vision set forth at the 1995 Beijing ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Women in Politics: Choosing between Ambition and Safety?

At the CSW69 NGO Forum's session Accelerating Progress By Addressing Barriers To Leadership And Democratic Participation examples of barriers for participation and programs and policies that promote inclusion where shared by speakers from Canada, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.   Evidence shows that barriers such as limited access to mentors and networks, lack of flexible work arrangements, and harassment and discrimination all limit women's participation and advancement in leadership roles. “In a democratic society, it is necessary to display a fair distribution of men and women at all levels of decision-making,” Jenny Gulamani-Abdulla, Co-Founder of the Canadian Federation For Citizenship (CFC), shared. CFC works to ensure that all residents of Canada are embraced, included and respected as all Canadians to participate in Canada’s progress. According to her “participation is what leads to opportunities to lead” . Furthermore, she shared success stories about mentorsh...
Post a Comment
Read more