Skip to main content

CSW66 blog: who listens when we #UNMute?

Sanne on screen in the General Assembly

Last Friday evening, the negotiations of the CSW Agreed Conclusions halted quite early and were only resumed again today in the afternoon. This meant that I had the morning to check out the statements by countries and NGOs in the impressive General Assembly. Sanne Van de Voort was one of just three NGO's present to deliver her statement - on behalf of WECF - in person.

But there were some hurdles to overcome first:

  • No one seemed to know where to get the 'extra' pass needed to access the balcony where the non-Member States delegates are allowed to observe;
  • It was difficult to find someone who could activate the elevator to take me to the 4th floor as my own ground pass was not sufficiently empowered; 
  • When I arrived at the entrance of the General Assembly balcony the door was blocked... by a wood block!
    Blocked door to the General Assembly balcony

Once on the balcony, I had plenty of seats to chose from... It is a sad and frankly completely unacceptable reality to have a UN negotiated process without the hussle and bustle - expert inputs, networking engagements, protests - of NGOs in the building.

Nadia with many empty seats on the observer balcony of the General Assembly

Also in the main hall of the Assembly very few Member States had made the effort to show up. It is great to be one of the lucky few NGOs selected to make a statement, but when no ones comes to listen it doesn't do much to #UNMuteCivilSociety and #UNMuteCSW66. I am happy to add that the Netherlands at least was there to listen. In the photo below, you see Lisanne Post from the delegation with Sanne Van de Voort in the left lower corner.

The UN General Assembly in New York

In her statement, Sanne addressed the lack of meaningful participation of civil society during the CSW.

"I stand in solidarity with those thousands of women (in all their diversity) that cannot be here today to raise their own voices. They cannot be here because of many inequalities: from discriminatory visa restrictions to vaccine inequity to financial restraints to conflicts and war. The absence of civil society experts and activists is unjustifiable and will certainly reduce the outcomes and impact of this CSW66." - Sanne Van de Voort

Sanne delivering her NGO statement at the CSW66

Sanne called for peace, effective and interlinked policies, funding and gender transformative actions. Now!

"Yes, dear Delegates, we are aware this is not a COP. We are not negotiating climate or environmental policies. But at this CSW you do have the opportunity to put gender equality and women’s human rights at the top of your Member-States’ climate and environmental agendas! [...] We can’t go backwards: not on human rights, nor on climate action!" - Sanne

Sanne's statement very much deserves a much larger audience. You can read the full statement and watch the video on WECF's website here.

And while it has been quite depressing and completely unhelpful to have so little civil society around in the UN (in the evening it was just 8 of us in total left on the couches, and that's the max we will likely be the coming days), the one advantage is that there has also been much less opposition around to add stress... Although there are apparently six of these buses currently driving around Manhatten this week with the slogan: "Equality starts - in the womb - CSW66". Sigh.


* Blog post by Nadia van der Linde, Program Manager International Processes at WO=MEN Dutch Gender Platform

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Women’s Rights Caucus Statement – Protect Women and Girls by upholding the Beijing Declaration

  The Women’s Rights Caucus, representing over 900 feminist advocates from around the world, urges you to oppose the proposed US draft resolution entitled  “Protection of women and girls through appropriate terminology.” Despite the title, we do not feel protected nor represented by this initiative. Download this statement as pdf.   Download this statement in Spanish.   On the heels of the first-ever recorded vote on the agreed conclusions of the annual meetings of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, and in complete disregard of the significant opposition their proposal got in the negotiation room, the United States has circulated a new resolution proposal which attempts to falsely state that the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action agreed that  “gender” was defined as “men and women”. It attributes to annex IV of the Report of the Fourth World Conference of Women a meaning that was never agreed by Member States, effectively rewriting th...
Post a Comment
Read more

ARTivism for Change: Creativity as Resistance at CSW69

Artwork "Who can I trust with my story?" from ArtVism in Uganda During the 69th CSW, the Our Voices Our Futures (OVOF) consortium organised a creative ARTivism for Change space where bold protest sign-making, intimate film screenings, and thought-provoking feminist dialogues blended together. Over two days, March 12 and 13, 2025, artists, activists, and allies transformed the space into dynamic real-life canvases of empowerment, solidarity, and cultural and political resistance.   In the main space of the Blue Gallery participants engaged with various stations, including Button Making , Journaling with Art , Drawing , and Protest Sign Making . Participants moved between activities, creating powerful messages of resistance and hope. The creativity extended beyond the activities themselves. Access Denied The ACCESS DENIED campaign , initiated by WO=MEN, was set up to be a photo installation. It highlights the deep gap between the inclusive vision set forth at the 1995 Beijing ...
Post a Comment
Read more

"Beat back the radicals!"

“We will beat back the radicals and we will fight all their falsehoods and we will help as best we can all the faithful UN delegations trying to help the unborn child. But, the Friday Fax and our presence at UN headquarters is not free. In fact, it is terribly expensive. Would you be able to make a sacrificial donation to our work of $500? $100? $50?” This quote is from a newsletter of an American based organization working to stop any agreement at the UN that might possibly be understood to mean that women can have a choice in their  reproduction. It is quite ironic to see the violence in the language, beat back the radicals, from a group who are working at the UN meeting devoted to ending Violence Against Women. Being here at the UN makes you feel in your body and soul that maintaining and advancing freedom of choice for women (and men) is a battle and not everyone fights fair. Some of our Dutch civil society friends attended a panel in which the two main speakers where ...
4 comments
Read more