Skip to main content

Claiming online space to secure freedom, take action & create change!

“IT should be about freedom and inclusion”. 

This was my key takeaway of OVOFs parallel event about (re)claiming online space to secure freedom. In this interesting event speakers from Lebanon, Bangladesh, Kenya and India talked about the opportunities and obstacles of the digital space, especially in the Global South.

Potential

All panellists agreed that technologies and the internet have great potential. TikTok can be used to break stigmas. The digital space can help tackle gender-based exclusion. Women and girls can use the internet to amplify their voices and share their experiences, for example via podcasts. Facebook and Instagram can be used as platforms to express, to unite, and to raise awareness. Technology can be mobilised to inform communities, and to promote their needs and interests. The digital space has the ability to facilitate equal access to information.

Challenges

However, when something is online it does not always mean that it is (more) accessible. Not everyone has access to internet due to costs. Some people cannot afford a phone or a laptop. Or they do not have access to a (stable) internet connection. Not everyone can participate in a meaningful way due to language barriers and (digital) illiteracy. The internet is thus a very exclusionary space.

There are social- economic barriers and certain groups are structurally silenced on the internet. Autocratic governments use the internet to control populations, spread propaganda, and to erase opposition. The issues of inequal access and inequal decision-making power are very alarming, but unfortunately systematic. They happen at global-, national-, local- and the household level.

Goals

Today our online and physical lives are strongly intertwined. The digital space should not be exclusionary. States, companies, and civil society should ensure freedom of speech and inclusion. Currently, the digital space is profit orientated and top-down organised. Technologies and the internet focus more on profit than on people.

I think the digital space should be reformed. There should be transparency and accountability mechanisms implemented, and meaningful participation for all. In my opinion, CSW67 should bridge the digital divide, set new global standards about transparency and accountability, and think of ways to guarantee free and safe internet.

Lena Brink, WO=MEN


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Women’s Rights Caucus Statement – Protect Women and Girls by upholding the Beijing Declaration

  The Women’s Rights Caucus, representing over 900 feminist advocates from around the world, urges you to oppose the proposed US draft resolution entitled  “Protection of women and girls through appropriate terminology.” Despite the title, we do not feel protected nor represented by this initiative. Download this statement as pdf.   Download this statement in Spanish.   On the heels of the first-ever recorded vote on the agreed conclusions of the annual meetings of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, and in complete disregard of the significant opposition their proposal got in the negotiation room, the United States has circulated a new resolution proposal which attempts to falsely state that the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action agreed that  “gender” was defined as “men and women”. It attributes to annex IV of the Report of the Fourth World Conference of Women a meaning that was never agreed by Member States, effectively rewriting th...
Post a Comment
Read more

ARTivism for Change: Creativity as Resistance at CSW69

Artwork "Who can I trust with my story?" from ArtVism in Uganda During the 69th CSW, the Our Voices Our Futures (OVOF) consortium organised a creative ARTivism for Change space where bold protest sign-making, intimate film screenings, and thought-provoking feminist dialogues blended together. Over two days, March 12 and 13, 2025, artists, activists, and allies transformed the space into dynamic real-life canvases of empowerment, solidarity, and cultural and political resistance.   In the main space of the Blue Gallery participants engaged with various stations, including Button Making , Journaling with Art , Drawing , and Protest Sign Making . Participants moved between activities, creating powerful messages of resistance and hope. The creativity extended beyond the activities themselves. Access Denied The ACCESS DENIED campaign , initiated by WO=MEN, was set up to be a photo installation. It highlights the deep gap between the inclusive vision set forth at the 1995 Beijing ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Women in Politics: Choosing between Ambition and Safety?

At the CSW69 NGO Forum's session Accelerating Progress By Addressing Barriers To Leadership And Democratic Participation examples of barriers for participation and programs and policies that promote inclusion where shared by speakers from Canada, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.   Evidence shows that barriers such as limited access to mentors and networks, lack of flexible work arrangements, and harassment and discrimination all limit women's participation and advancement in leadership roles. “In a democratic society, it is necessary to display a fair distribution of men and women at all levels of decision-making,” Jenny Gulamani-Abdulla, Co-Founder of the Canadian Federation For Citizenship (CFC), shared. CFC works to ensure that all residents of Canada are embraced, included and respected as all Canadians to participate in Canada’s progress. According to her “participation is what leads to opportunities to lead” . Furthermore, she shared success stories about mentorsh...
Post a Comment
Read more