Skip to main content

CSW67 Pitch: Age- and Gender-Responsive Human Rights: Due Diligence in the Technology Sector

 


During the NGO briefing on January 26, 2023, members of civil society pitched their recommendations to the Dutch CSW67 delegation. Together they had one clear message: Involve us and take human rights in digital spaces seriously.

Sebnem Kenis, of Plan International, pushes for age- and gender-responsive human rights impact assessments and due diligence in the tech-sector.

"Technology revolutionizes our lives for the better but at the same time it facilitates new forms of discrimination, violence and harms. Many digital services and products are gender-biased or discriminatory by design or pose novel risks for children and young people, especially for girls who are at the intersection of age and gender. For example social media algorithms amplifying misogynistic and gender-stereotypical content, and beauty filters promoting harmful beauty standards. These problems could have been avoided had tech-companies conducted age- and gender-responsive human rights impact assessments and due diligence at the early stages of their design.   

Human rights due diligence means that corporations proactively assess, identify and prevent potential human rights harms that may arise from their products and services. This “do- no- harm” approach is a requirement set out in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, which provides the global standard for ensuring businesses respect human rights. Many big tech-companies have already voluntarily committed to human rights due diligence. However, as in other voluntary commitments, there is a lack of implementation.   


Governments can play a crucial role in addressing this by introducing laws and regulations requiring tech- sector to implement this effectively and ensure this is done in an age- and gender-responsive way. For example assessments and mitigation plans for new digital products and services must take into account potential impacts on different age groups and genders, including girls and young women.    


We request the Dutch and other European governments taking the lead to make this a priority for CSW and ensure that the tech-sector respects human rights. This is essential to create a more inclusive, equitable digital future for all, including girls."   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Women’s Rights Caucus Statement – Protect Women and Girls by upholding the Beijing Declaration

  The Women’s Rights Caucus, representing over 900 feminist advocates from around the world, urges you to oppose the proposed US draft resolution entitled  “Protection of women and girls through appropriate terminology.” Despite the title, we do not feel protected nor represented by this initiative. Download this statement as pdf.   Download this statement in Spanish.   On the heels of the first-ever recorded vote on the agreed conclusions of the annual meetings of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, and in complete disregard of the significant opposition their proposal got in the negotiation room, the United States has circulated a new resolution proposal which attempts to falsely state that the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action agreed that  “gender” was defined as “men and women”. It attributes to annex IV of the Report of the Fourth World Conference of Women a meaning that was never agreed by Member States, effectively rewriting th...

ARTivism for Change: Creativity as Resistance at CSW69

Artwork "Who can I trust with my story?" from ArtVism in Uganda During the 69th CSW, the Our Voices Our Futures (OVOF) consortium organised a creative ARTivism for Change space where bold protest sign-making, intimate film screenings, and thought-provoking feminist dialogues blended together. Over two days, March 12 and 13, 2025, artists, activists, and allies transformed the space into dynamic real-life canvases of empowerment, solidarity, and cultural and political resistance.   In the main space of the Blue Gallery participants engaged with various stations, including Button Making , Journaling with Art , Drawing , and Protest Sign Making . Participants moved between activities, creating powerful messages of resistance and hope. The creativity extended beyond the activities themselves. Access Denied The ACCESS DENIED campaign , initiated by WO=MEN, was set up to be a photo installation. It highlights the deep gap between the inclusive vision set forth at the 1995 Beijing ...

"Beat back the radicals!"

“We will beat back the radicals and we will fight all their falsehoods and we will help as best we can all the faithful UN delegations trying to help the unborn child. But, the Friday Fax and our presence at UN headquarters is not free. In fact, it is terribly expensive. Would you be able to make a sacrificial donation to our work of $500? $100? $50?” This quote is from a newsletter of an American based organization working to stop any agreement at the UN that might possibly be understood to mean that women can have a choice in their  reproduction. It is quite ironic to see the violence in the language, beat back the radicals, from a group who are working at the UN meeting devoted to ending Violence Against Women. Being here at the UN makes you feel in your body and soul that maintaining and advancing freedom of choice for women (and men) is a battle and not everyone fights fair. Some of our Dutch civil society friends attended a panel in which the two main speakers where ...